Table 1
List of species evaluated. The first and last year of the data included in the analyses from the AOS database and the reference used to evaluate the native/natural morphological characteristics. Reference for in situ refers to the species description for comparison with ex situ plants (Table 8). NA= No data from wild type.
Table 2
Aerangis: Linear coefficients (slope (beta) and standard deviation, SD) of the morphological and floral characteristics across time. NA = not evaluated. The characters included are: dorsal sepal length (DSL), dorsal sepal width (DSW), petal length (PL), petal width (PW), lateral sepal length (LSL), lip length (LL), and number of flowers (NumF). The negative binomial regression (aNB) or Log Normal (bLN) regression were used because the number of flowers has a distribution which is often overdispersed (
Cameron & Triverdi 1998) with most plants having few flowers and a few having large number of flowers; significant levels p<0.05, * p<0.01 and ** p<0.001. Values in
bold blue are significant negative coefficients; values in
bold black are significant positive coefficients, values in regular are nonsignificant coefficients.
Table 3
Angreacum: Linear coefficients (beta and standard deviation, SD) of the morphological and floral characteristics across time. NA= not evaluated. The characters included are dorsal sepal length (DSL), dorsal sepal width (DSW), petal length (PL), petal width (PW), lateral sepal length (LSL), lip length (LL), number of flowers (NumF). See
Table 2 legend for statistical details.
Table 4
Brassavola (Bv.), Brassia, Dendrobium and Laelia: Linear coefficients (beta and standard deviation, SD) of the morphological and floral characteristics across time. NA= not evaluated. The characters included are dorsal sepal length (DSL), dorsal sepal width (DSW), petal length (PL), petal width (PW), lateral sepal length (LSL), lip length (LL), number of flowers (NumF). See
Table 2 legend for statistical details.
Table 5
Cattleya: Linear coefficients (beta and standard deviation, SD) of the morphological and floral characteristics across time. NA= not evaluated. The characters included are dorsal sepal length (DSL), dorsal sepal width (DSW), petal length (PL), petal width (PW), lateral sepal length (LSL), lip length (LL), number of flowers (NumF). See
Table 2 legend for statistical details.
Table 6
Paphiopedilum: Linear coefficients (beta and standard deviation, SD) of the morphological and floral characteristics across time. NA= not evaluated. The characters included are dorsal sepal length (DSL), dorsal sepal width (DSW), petal length (PL), petal width (PW), lateral sepal length (LSL), lip length (LL), number of flowers (NumF). See Table 2 legend for statistical details.
Table 7
Phalaenopsis: Linear coefficients (beta and standard deviation, SD) of the morphological and floral characteristics across time. NA= Not evaluated. The characters included are dorsal sepal length (DSL), dorsal sepal width (DSW), petal length (PL), petal width (PW), lateral sepal length (LSL), lip length (LL), number of flowers (NumF). See Table 2 legend for statistical details.
Table 8
Summary of the proportion of species where characters were significantly different (p< 0.05) across time (column wise proportions). The selection coefficients are in Table 2a-f. Values in brackets are the number of species. The characters included are dorsal sepal length (DSL), dorsal sepal width (DSW), petal length (PL), petal width (PW), lateral sepal length (LSL), lip length (LL), number of flowers (NumF). Note sample size (number of species) varies among characters.
Table 9
Summary of proportion of characters by genera which show significant change in time (rowwise). Positive= Proportion of characters with significant positive change in time. Negative= Proportion of characters with significant negative change in time. No selection= Proportion of characters with no significant change (see Table 2-7).
Table 10
Comparison of morphological characteristics of morphology from plants in their natural environment (in situ) vs. ex situ plants. The morphological characters of plants in the database are considered either W= within the natural morphological range, O= outside the natural morphological range with ''+'' values larger than reported in nature and ''-'' values smaller than reported in nature, ''--'' for species where the character was not evaluated. The morphological range was collected from species description (see Table 1 for references). The characters included are dorsal sepal length (DSL), dorsal sepal width (DSW), petal length (PL), petal width (PW), lateral sepal length (LSL), lip length (LL), number of flowers (NumF).
Table 11
The proportion of species by genera which had morphological characters either larger ''+'', smaller ''-'', both ''±'' or within ''W''. The proportions are rowwise. See Table 10 for character description.
Table 12
The proportion of species which had morphological characters either larger ''+'', smaller ''-'' or both ''±''. The proportions are rowwise. See Table 10 for character description. Dorsal sepal length (DSL), dorsal sepal width (DSW), petal length (PL), petal width (PW), lateral sepal length (LSL), lip length (LL), number of flowers (NumF).