Open-access Notes on the identify of ceratostylis siamensis (epidendroideae: podochileae) from India

Abstract.

While conducting taxonomic studies on the tribe Podochileae (Orchidaceae) for the Flora of India, two species, Ceratostylis siamensis and Ceratostylis himalaica have been examined using types, protologues, fresh specimens, and authentic herbarium collections. Ceratostylis siamensis was previously reported and documented in Arunachal Pradesh, India. However, we determined upon closer examination that this record was based on erroneous identification. The correct identity of this species is C. himalaica. Consequently, Ceratostylis siamensis is excluded from the flora of India.

Keywords: Arunachal Pradesh; Ceratostylis himalaica; misidentification; orchids; taxonomy

Introduction

The genus Ceratostylis Blume (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae: Podochileae) comprises approximately 147 species distributed from India and China through Southeast Asia, New Guinea and the southwest Pacific islands (Chase et al. 2015, Pridgeon et al. 2005). Three species are found in India (Singh et al. 2019).

The genus is exclusively characterized by solitary, terete or dorsiventrally flattened leaf, midlobe of labellum swollen and bulbous. During a taxonomic revision of Ceratostylis in India under the National Mission on Himalayan studies, Ceratostylis siamensis Rolfe ex Downie and Ceratostylis himalaica Hook.f. have been studied with types, protologues, fresh specimens and authentic herbarium collections. Whether true C. siamensis distributed in China, Laos, Thailand, Tibet, Vietnam, has been found distinct by virtue of its short, erect, unbranched stems (1.5‒5.0 cm long) with closely placed pseudobulbs forming a tuft; leaves obliquely emarginate with obtuse lobes, lateral sepals are 3-veined and the labellum is distinctly 3-lobed.

Gogoi and Riniya (2020) recorded Ceratostylis siamensis from the Ziro Valley, Lower Subansiri district of Arunachal Pradesh. This marked a new distributional record for India. Through meticulous examination of voucher specimens of C. siamensis deposited at the Herbarium of the Orchid Research Centre Tippi (not listed in “Index Herbariorum,” henceforth abbreviated as OHT) and the Herbarium of the Orchid Society of Eastern Himalaya (TOSEHIM), Regional Orchid Germplasm Conservation and Propagation (Assam Circle), as well as living specimens conserved in the conservatory of the CCF office at Hapoli in the Lower Subansiri district and with consultation of relevant literature (Chen et al. 2009, Chowdhery 1998, Hooker 1890, 1894, King & Pantling 1898, Pal 2013, Pearce & Cribb 2002, Pradhan 1979, Rao 2010, Seidenfaden 1986, Singh et al. 2019), it was identified as C. himalaica Hook.f. Therefore, C. siamensis has been excluded from Indian flora. A comprehensive description of C. himalaica and its relationship with C. siamensis has been discussed. Information on phenology, habitat, distribution & specimens are included to facilitate a better understanding for C. himalaica.

Ceratostylis himalaica Hook.f., Fl. Brit. India 5: 826. 1890; Ritaia himalaica (Hook.f.) King & Pantl., Ann. Roy. Bot. Gard. (Calcutta) 8: 157, t.214. 1898; Ceratostylis siamensis auct. non Rolfe ex Downie. 1925: Gogoi & Riniya, Richardiana: 134, f. 1‒2. 2020. Eria ramosissima Wall. ex Hook.f., Fl. Brit. India 5: 826. 1890.

TYPE: Bhutan, Griffith 5214 (P!) [P00403825] Lectotype (inadvertent designation by Seidenfaden, 1986: 117 by reference to “P! Type”); Griffith 5214 (syn. K-LINDL!) [K000810605]; Griffith 1187 (syn. K-LINDL!) [K000810604]; East Nepal, 10th Dec., Hooker 359 (syn. K-LINDL!) [K000810606]; Hooker 359 (syn. K-LINDL!) [K000810603]; India, Khasia Hills, Gibson s.n. (syn. CAL).

Epiphytic, prostrate plants, 7-19 cm long. Stems 4‒15 cm long, pendulous, dichotomously branched, branched stem is formed by the union of rhizome segments from the base of each pseudobulbs; the elongation of the stem continues with age by adding the fresh shoots every season, enveloped thoroughly by 0.5-1.5 cm long sheaths; sheaths many imbricate, scale-like, ovate-lanceolate, subacute with strongly veined, each branches bearing a single leaf. Leaves 5.4‒6.6 × 0.5‒0.7 cm, linear-oblong, fleshy, apex unequally bilobed, smaller lobe acute and larger lobe acute or rounded, base tapering towards 0.6‒1 cm long petiole. Inflorescence 0.8‒1.5 cm long, arising from base of the leaf, 1‒2-flowered, subcapitate; peduncle 4‒5 mm long, enveloped with two sheaths. Floral bracts 3.5‒4.0 × 0.8‒1.2 mm long, lanceolate, acute to acuminate, cymbiform, glabrous. Flowers 5.2‒8.0 × 3.5‒5.0 mm, externally pubescent, greenish-yellow, petals purplishbrown, lip yellowish with auricular obscure side lobes with purple margins, apical part with yellow thick cushion-like portion on the back side. Pedicel and ovary 1.7‒3.2 mm long, densely pubescent. Sepals sub-equal, pubescent externally; dorsal sepal 2.8‒3 × 1.3‒2.0 mm, lanceolate, subacute, concave, 3-veined, often purple coloured; lateral sepals similar, 2.4‒2.7 × 3‒3.5 mm, broadly ovate, acuminate, 3‒5 veined, often purple coloured, basal portion falcate, connate at the base to form a mentum. Petals 2.6‒2.8 × 0.7‒0.9 mm, linear, spreading, acute, glabrous, 3-nerved. Labellum 2.1‒2.8 × 0.9‒1.2 mm, obscurely 3-lobed, fleshy, cymbiform, basal portion saccate, margin entire, apical portion consist of cushion-like callus on the abaxial side, side lobes are auricular, disc hairy. Column 0.8‒1.0 mm long, erect, base with 1.05 mm long foot attached to the base of the labellum. Clinandrium 0.8 mm wide. Stigma broad. Anther 0.4‒0.5 × 0.7‒0.8 mm, 4-celled, ovate, terminal. Pollinia 8, unequal, ca. 0.5 ‒0.7 × 0.1‒0.2 mm, clavate, connected to an oblong small viscidium by granular stipe. Capsules 5‒6 × 3‒4 mm, ellipsoid. (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Ceratostylis himalaica.

Phenology: Plants flower from May to June; fruits were recorded in July.

Habitat: Epiphytic, found on moss-covered tree trunks and rock boulders at elevations of 1000-2000 m. Host plant: observed growing on the trunks and branches of Quercus griffithii Hook.f. & Thomson ex Miq. (Fagaceae).

Global distribution: India, Bhutan, China, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Vietnam.

Distribution in India: Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, West Bengal.

Specimens examined: Arunachal Pradesh: Jengging, 06 Nov 1990, Hegde 26034 (Orchid Herbarium Tipi, not in “Index Herbariorum” and hence-forth abbreviated as OHT); Sangti, 1676 m, 05 Sep 1983, Hegde 9662 (OHT); West Kameng, Sessa, 02 Oct 1980, A. N. Rao 77239 (ASSAM); 09 Jun 1980, Hegde 4017 (APFH); 09 Jul 1983, A. N. Rao 9172 (OHT); 23 Jun 1982, Hegde 2649 (OHT); 14 Jun 1980, Hegde 2649 (OHT); Sessa Top, 27 Jul 1996, A. N. Rao 29025 (OHT); Subansiri, Hapoli Behind D.C’s Office, 10 May 1966, A. R. K Sastry 44873 (ASSAM, ARUN); Sayata to Paji, 20 Nov 1964, A. R. K Sastry 40794 (ASSAM); Ziro to Begi, 04 Jun 1961, G. V. Subba Rao 24746 (ASSAM); Begi, 26 Apr 1980, G. D. Pal 78255 (ARUN); Kameng F.D, Dirang Dzong, 1829 m, 16 May 1957, R. S. Rao 7538 (ASSAM); Sissini camp, 1219 m, 25 Mar 1957, G. Panigrahi 5995 (ASSAM); Sisni, 10 Jun 1984, Hegde 15862 (OHT); Hegde 15863 (OHT); Hegde 15864 (OHT); Hegde 15865 (OHT); Baha Hill Kalaktang, 10 May 1958, G. Panigrahi 15320 (ASSAM); Siang F.D, Geling to Kepangla, 823 m-1524 m, 10 Nov 1958, R.S. Rao 17548 (ASSAM); Sirang-Geizing, 640 m-1372 m, 20 Nov 1958, R.S. Rao 17923 (ASSAM);West Siang, Nyodo-Sibe near Basar, 28 Nov 2010, M. Bhaumik 25537 (ARUN); Lohit, Forest Around Camp C5, 27 Dec 1969, B. Krishna 48757 (ASSAM); Dibang Valley, Mehao lake, 1500 m, 17 Apr 1999, M. Bhaumik 2428 (CAL); Mipi, 1500 m, 05 Sep 2000, M. Bhaumik & M.K. Pathak 3549 (CAL); 01 Apr 1984, K. Haridasan 652 (APFH); Deli valley, Kingdon Ward 8100 (K); Ziro valley, Tale wildlife Sanctuary, 03.13.2020 (in fl.), Gogoi 00806 (OHT; TOSEHIM); Lower Subansiri, Kardo forest, Hapoli, 778 m, 23 Sep 2021, S. Sarkar 94996 (Cultivated at CNHPargola). Manipur: Chowlu s.n. (Centre for Orchid gene conservation of Eastern Himalayan region, not in “Index Herbariorum” and hence-forth abbreviated as COGCEHR); Senapati Hills, 1435 m, 26 Mar 2003, S. Phukan 60281 (ASSAM). Meghalaya: Khasia Hills, Cherapunji, 1219 m, Jun 1897, CG Foundlock s.n. (CAL, P); 05 Apr 1972, P.C. Pant 50833 (ASSAM). Mizoram: Lushai Hills, Parry 563 (K); Koelz 32747 (K); Blue Mountain, Lushai Hills, 7000 ft, 21 Apr 1953, Thakur Rup Chand 7005 (MICH). Nagaland: Reserve forest, Puliebadze, 1623 m, 20 Nov 1973, T.M. Hynniewta 56278 (ASSAM); Tseminyu, Hynniewta 80727 (ASSAM). Sikkim: Pantling 149 (BM, K, W); J.D. Hooker s.n. (P); 1220 m, J.D. Hooker s.n. (CAL, P); 1524 m, Jun 1899, Pantling 149 (CAL, GH); 1891, Pantling 149 (CAL, P); Tendong, Pantling 149 (K); Teesta Valley, Pradhan 1 (C); Trudel 598 (C); Rongli-Rorathang, 15 Sep 2018, D.K.A 40511 (Cultivated at BSHC). West Bengal: Sinchu La, 1767 m, 02 Mar 1934, K. Biswas 1950 (CAL).

Notes: Ceratostylis himalaica differs from C. siamensis in several key characteristics: it possesses a prostrate, elongated stem (10‒15 cm long), which branches and originates from the union of rhizome segments at the base of each pseudobulb. This elongation of the stem continues over time as fresh shoots are added each season. The leaves are obliquely emarginate at the apex with acute lobes, the lateral sepals are 5-veined and the labellum is obscurely 3-lobed or unlobed. In contrast, C. siamensis features short, erect, unbranched stems (1.5‒5.0 cm long) with closely placed psedobulbs forming a tuft. Its leaves are also obliquely emarginate but with obtuse lobes, the lateral sepals are 3-veined and the labellum is distinctly 3-lobed.

The specimens reported by Gogoi and Riniya (2020) exhibit the characteristics of C. himalaica. While describing C. himalaica, Hooker (1890) erroneously mentioned the lateral sepals as 3-veined, whereas his original illustration [Icon. Pl. t.2101] (Hook.f. 1894) depicts lateral sepals with 5 veins. This discrepancy is supported by fresh collections from Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh and observations by Seidenfaden (1986), who noted specimens from Sikkim with 5 red stripes on the sepals. In contrast, C. siamensis is described as having lateral sepals with 3 purple veins. Dissected floral parts in Gogoi and Riniya (2020) also reveal 5-veined lateral sepals (Fig. 1D,F), indicating their identity as C. himalaica.

Based on the stem structure, leaf, petal and labellum characteristics, the specimens reported by Gogoi and Riniya (2020) as C. siamensis have been redetermined as C. himalaica, leading to the exclusion of the former from the Flora of India.

Figure 2
Type specimen of Ceratostylis siamensis from Kew [Barcode no: K000597122].

Figure 3
Illustration of Ceratostylis himalaica.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Director of the Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata and the Head of Office of the Botanical Survey of India, Sikkim Himalayan Regional Centre, Gangtok, for providing facilities and encouragement. The authors are grateful to the authorities of Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, for their online databases and permission to use type specimen image of Ceratostylis siamensis and the Herbarium of the Orchid Research Centre Tippi (OHT) & the Orchid Society of Eastern Himalaya (TOSEHIM), Regional Orchid Germplasm Conservation and Propagation (Assam circle), for granting access to the herbarium and for sending digital images of the herbarium specimens. Additionally, the authors extend their gratitude to the forest department authorities of Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh for providing necessary permissions and assistance during field surveys. We are also thankful to the reviewers for helping in refining the manuscript.

Author contributions. SS: Conceptualization (equal); Investigation (equal); Writing - original draft preparation (equal); Writing - reviewing and editing (equal); DKA: Supervision (equal); Writing - reviewing and editing (equal); Investigation (equal); DM: Supervision (equal); Writing - reviewing and editing (equal); Investigation (equal); MKl: Data curation (equal); Investigation (equal).

Funding. The Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change, New Delhi, is gratefully acknowledged for financial assistance under the Himalayan Research Fellowship scheme (Project ref no. GBPNI/NMHS-2017-2018/ HSF-08) of the National Mission on Himalayan Studies.

Conflict of interest. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Literature cited

  • Chase, M. W., Cameron, K. M., Freudenstein, J. V., Pridgeon, A. M., Salazar, G., Van den Berg, C. & Schuiteman, A. (2015). An updated classification of Orchidaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 177 (2), 151-174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12234
    » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12234
  • Chen, X. Q., Liu, Z. J., Zhu, G. H., Lang, K. Y., Ji, Z. H., Luo, Y. B., Jin, X. H., Cribb, P. J., Wood, J. J., Gale, S. W., Ormerod, P., Vermeulen, J. J., Wood, H. P., Clayton, D. & Bell, A. (2009). Orchidaceae. In: Z. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven & D. Y. Hong (eds.), Flora of China, 25, Orchidaceae (pp. 1-570). Beijing: Science Press and St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
  • Chowdhery, H. J. (1998). Orchid Flora of Arunachal Pradesh Dehradun: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.
  • Gogoi, K. & Riniya, K. (2020). Ceratostylis siamensis (Orchidaceae), a new addition to the flora of India. Richardiana, 4, 134-138.
  • Hooker, J. D. (1890). The Flora of British India, vol. 5 (pp. 667-858). Ashford, Kent: Reeve and Co.
  • Hooker, J. D. (1894). Hooker’s Icones plantarum, Ser. 4, 22 (i-iv). Pl. 2101. Bentham-Moxon Trustees.
  • King, G. & Pantling, R. (1898). The orchids of Sikkim Himalaya. Annals of the Royal Botanic Garden Calcutta, 8, 1-342.
  • Pal, G. D. (2013). Orchidaceae. In Flora of Lower Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh (India), 2, 351-436. Kolkata: Botanical Survey of India.
  • Pearce, N. R. & Cribb, P. J. (2002). Flora of Bhutan. 3 (3), The Orchids of Bhutan Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Gardens.
  • Pradhan, U. C. (1979). Indian orchids: guide to identification & culture 2 Faridabad, India: Thomson Press Ltd.
  • Pridgeon, A. M., Cribb, P. J., Chase, M. W. & Rasmussen, F. N. (2005). Genera Orchidacearum. 4, Epidendroideae (Part one). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rao, A. N. (2010). Orchid Flora of Arunachal Pradesh an update. Bulletin of Arunachal Forest Research, 26 (1-2), 82-110.
  • Seidenfaden, G. (1986). Orchid genera in Thailand XIII. Thirty-three epidendroid genera. Opera Botanica a Societate Botanica Lundensi vol. 89 , ( pp. 1-214 ). Lund, Copenhagen.
  • Singh, S. K., Agrawala, D. K., Jalal, J. S., Dash, S. S., Mao, A. A. & Singh, P. (2019). Orchids of India- A pictorial guide Kolkata: Botanical Survey of India.

Publication Dates

  • Date of issue
    May-Aug 2024

History

  • Received
    28 Feb 2024
  • Accepted
    21 May 2024
location_on
Lankester Botanical Garden, University of Costa Rica Jardín Botánico Lankester, Cartago, Cartago, Costa Rica, CR, 302-7050, 25117949, 25117931 - E-mail: franco.pupulin@ucr.ac.cr
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Acessibilidade / Reportar erro